THOSE INSIDIOUS DO GOODERS ARE THE REAL PROBLEM

I've written about this before but it really gets up my nose - the man pictured left was a literary genius with his works celebrated the world over, and yet all these years after his death he has become the victim of those do-gooder arseholes who are determined to sanitise history. It's happening the world over and we really need to tell these small minded, bigoted, liberal, plank heads where to get off.

We should apologise to the spirit of Mark Twain for allowing these arseholes in our generation to achieve such sway with the authorities.

What would Mark Twain think of prissily bowdlerizing Huckleberry Finn. Or — to be more specific — what would he think of a U.S. publisher’s recently announced decision to purge a new Huck Finn edition of the N-word?

"The book is an anti-racist book and to change the language changes the power of the book," Cindy Lovell.

Of course that fact that the work is anti-racist escapes these dumb bastards who seek to protect out moral wellbeing. Don't they realise they are on the same level as the Lebanon authorities who banned The Diary of Anne Frank for showing Jews in a favourable light? And what will they do with all the old editions of Huck Finn with the offending words?

Burn them, maybe!

Barrie Summy's October Book Review - They banned old Huck Finn

This post is part of Barrie's Summy October Book Review which are always posted on the first Wednesday in each month - and as we have just come out of banned books week I have decided to talk a little about Huckleberry Finn which is indeed banned in many libraries and schools in both the UK and US. In fact in the US the book is actually the fourth most banned book.

Now I only read Huckleberry Finn for the first time last year - together with Tom Sawyer it came pre-installed on my eReader. Of course I knew the story well from the various film and TV versions I've seen over the years but had never actually read the book. Maybe if the books hadn't been bundled on the eReader then I never would have - I'm glad I did. Both are excellent books and I think Huck Finn is one of the best books I have ever read.

Now the book is often banned because of it's continual use of the word, "nigger". Now it's not always used in a particularly racist way but it is used a lot - on one page I counted the word 23 times. And whilst I don't agree with banning any book I can see a reason for the books use being limited in schools. Maybe it's not for the very young but once a child reaches a certain level of maturity then of course they should study the book.  And as I've said the book is of its time rather than racist. Huck is firm friends with a runaway slave called Jim and the two have some thrillingly written adventures together but Huck refers to Jim throughout as, "nigger". It was an accepted word at the time and even if it is unacceptable today and would never be used by any right thinking person, it was very much in common use back in the day.

Banning the book serves no good purpose and is a far greater crime than allowing children to read it and opening the subject up for discussion. Discussing with children how we, as people, have changed and how the "N" word can be cruel and hurtful is a useful lesson in itself. There is no reason to ban such a wonderful book from one of the all time great writers merely because it reflects the times in which it was written.

If Huck Finn is racist then Mark Twain was also racist which means we should also ban Tom Sawyer, Merry Tales, Roughing It,  Innocents Abroad and all the other works the prolific author produced. Where does it stop? Let's ban the entire Twain bibliography..

Or then again we could give readers credit for their intelligence and allow them to decide for themselves - in no way is Huckleberry Finn racist. In fact it was ground-breaking for its time and very controversial because of its portrayal of the friendship between a white boy and a black man. And whilst it is true that the story uses racial stereotypes this can also be argued as being consistent with the times in which it was written. And besides the friendship between Huck and Jim can be seen as hitting out against racist views and attacking racism itself. However there is also a camp that claims that Twain was unable to rise above racist stereotypes and used the character of Jim for the comedic racial effect that white readers of the time enjoyed.


The more I think about it the more uncertain I become about the suitability of the book for young children, but I don't think banning it is the answer. Is it racist? I don't think so and am of the opinion that Twain humanises the character of Jim and does therefore strike a blow against racism.

Decide for yourself is what I say...