![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiJswKOrtGuimHv_MMFSawgGI222cNYHbCHUT4RMwnx20X9cK0UK4iM9AQNo02yyI4Mwrb8Ng_QhN-XgK1E1aoaEmqCiA9Lq42lPwf1cHz_3ZjBkX-6rU4fD7SKaYQ4mF8abEjEB0GVl4ad/s320/BN-FR575_badsex_FR_20141121175315.jpg)
Lisa Moylett, publisher, told The Times newspaper: “We are throwing down the gauntlet. No more ‘bad sex’ writing. That is not something we should be celebrating.” The publisher was recently joined by Mariella Frostrup, editor of the recently released Desire: 100 of Literature’s Sexiest Stories,at The Times Cheltenham Literature Festival and backed this point up.
Speaking of the award, Toby Lichtig recently wrote in, The Guardian Newspaper - 'In a sense, my question is: what is good sex in fiction as opposed to mere pornography? (Which also leads me to ask: does good fiction suddenly stop becoming good if it's arousing?) I suppose one problem is that sex is so often idealised in books, as it is in films. Earth-moving, transcendental, simultaneously-orgasmic sex is far more common in the history of the world's storytelling than is an awkward, exhausted and querulous quickie between setting the alarm and getting up to calm the baby. But good bad sex (the embarrassment, the mutual misunderstanding) should be honoured in fiction no more nor less than the real fireworks.'
Personally I take all of the points listed above, and I suppose an award for good sex writing is no different to awards for writing in other genres, The Daggers, for instance given for good crime writing but there will always be an element of sniggering where sex is involved. Hey, it's the British way and the award is not really going to be called A STIFFIE you know. Though, I can't help thinking that maybe it should.
No comments:
Post a Comment