Scotland Yard are currently fighting a bizarre court case in order to
keep a selection of old files, relating to the Jack the Ripper case
a secret. There is much speculation as to why the authorities in 2012 would want the files to remain a secret, leading many to believe that the files contain the answer and that it was all hushed up at the time of the murders in order to avert a scandal.
The Met Police is fighting the legal battle to keep files detailing the
investigation into the notorious Jack the Ripper case secret because and in their words, '
To
maintain confidentiality for Victorian 'supergrasses'. The documents are
said to include four new suspects for the serial killings which terrorized Whitechapel in 1888 and have become one of the world's most
infamous unsolved cases.
The historic ledgers have 36,000 entries detailing police interaction with informants between 1888 to 1912.
However, Scotland Yard reportedly believes disclosing the names could
hinder recruiting and gathering information from modern informants,
affecting terrorism investigations - and even lead to the Victorians'
relatives being attacked.
Trevor Marriott, a Ripper investigator and former murder squad
detective, has spent three years attempting to obtain uncensored
versions of the documents.The ledgers provide details of the police’s
dealings with thousands of informants from 1888 to 1912, including some
who provided information during the original Ripper investigation.
A sample of about 40 pages from the Scotland Yard ledgers was released
to last week’s tribunal, but with the names of informants and other key
details blacked out.
According to Mr Marriott, the files contain the names of at least four
new suspects, as well as other pieces of evidence.He said: “I believe
this to be the very last chance that we may have to solve the mystery of
Jack the Ripper.
“To have any possibility of getting near the truth about those horrific
crimes we must see what these ledgers contain.“It may be that within
them we find the final piece of the jigsaw that would unlock this
mystery and lead to the identity of the killer, or killers, albeit 123
years too late.”
Jack the Ripper slaughtered at least five women between August and
November 1888 in the slums of Whitechapel, east London, but various
experts have claimed other murders may have been committed by the killer
on earlier and later dates.
The police made several mistakes in the inquiry and detection
techniques of the time were basic – with no fingerprinting and science
unable even to distinguish between animal and human blood.
As a result, there is no conclusive evidence to point to the true
identity of Jack the Ripper and the case remains one of the world’s
great unsolved mysteries. Among a long list of possible suspects are
Queen Victoria’s grandson the Duke of Clarence, who died in an asylum in
1892, and the painter Walter Sickert.
Mr Marriott, who joined Bedfordshire Police in 1970 and worked as a
detective constable until the mid-1980s, began researching the Jack the
Ripper case in 2003. He has previously published one book on the
subject which put forward the name of Carl Feigenbaum, a German
merchant executed for the murder of a woman in New York, as a new
suspect.
On uncovering references to the ledgers in 2008, Mr Marriott applied to
see the documents under the Freedom of Information Act. The Met
refused and he appealed to the Information Commissioner who also decided
the books should not be revealed.Now Mr Marriott has undergone the
final appeal stage to the Information Tribunal, in which the case is
heard by a panel of three judges.
The three-day hearing involved a detective inspector, identified only
as ‘D’, speaking to the court from behind a screen because of his
sensitive role running the force’s intelligence-gathering operation from
informants.Detective Inspector ‘D’ told the tribunal that unveiling
the files could deter informants from coming forward in future, and
could even put off members of the public from phoning Crimestoppers or
the antiterrorist hotline.
“The interpretation on the street will be that the police have revealed
the identity of informants,” said ‘D’.“Confidence in the system is
maintaining the safety of informants, regardless of age.”
Det Insp ‘D’ said the passage of time did not make publication of
informants’ identities less sensitive because their descendants could be
targeted by criminals with a grudge.
“Look at one of the world’s best-known informants, Judas Iscariot. If
someone could draw a bloodline from Judas Iscariot to a present day
person then that person would face a risk, although I know that seems an
extreme example,” the officer said.Another senior officer, Detective
Superintendent Julian McKinney, told the tribunal that releasing names
would make police officers less capable of preventing terrorist attacks
and organised crime, and make informants vulnerable to attack.
Det Supt McKinney said: “Regardless of the time, regardless of whether they are dead, they should never be disclosed.
“They come to us only when they have the confidence in our system that their identity will not be disclosed.”
But Mr Marriott said a number of historical files have previously been
released which contained details of informants.He argued there was no
evidence to show descendants of informants who have been named had come
to harm.
The tribunal decision is expected later this year.