"Foul", cries the REF, since the final points will have to allow for inflation.
And so with 1969 leading 94 pages to 62, 1979 is not going to take this on the chin and delivers a sizzling uppercut by having more picture strips than 69 but 69 raises a quizzical eyebrow and makes a comeback by having twice as many text stories.
The final result is that 1979 limps away with a busted spine and 1969 loses a back cover.
The main difference between these books is just that - a decade apart they show how children's reading had changed over time. Rare was the child in 1979 who would have been pleased with a book that contained nothing but text stories. I don't think I used to even read the text stories as a kid. Some would say it was a dumbing down but in reality it was probably merely a by-product of the comic strip becoming the main form of reading for children. Differences in fashions are also highlighted in the illustrations. Were the Seventies really that bad?....there we were in the middle of a sexual revolution wearing clothes that guaranteed we wouldn't get laid.
Both books are heavy on features and the 1979 book contains a welcome look at Saint creator, Leslie Charteris. A feature that is amusing to read now is The Pop's New Faces article in the 1969 annual. Author uncredited, the piece mentions such names as Jimmy Hendrix and Pink Flloyd. But getting top billing in the pop article is good old Englebert Humperdink
The 1968 annual features articles on History, London, Motor Racing and there's even a judo lesson in picture strip form showing some devastating blows. I wonder if any children ever broke a siblings nose on Christmas day after finding this book in their stockings.
No comments:
Post a Comment